Login or Register
 Home
 Communication
 Comments
 Forums
 Calendar
 Messages
 Recommend Us
 Shout Box
 News
 Submit News
 Stories Archive
 Surveys
 Topics
 Site Info
 Donations
 Feeds
 Legal
 Members List
 Member Map
 Search
 Sitemap
 Statistics
 Top 25
 Links
 Top A&A Sites

 WW2 History
 WW2 Archives
 WW2 Propaganda
 WW2 Discussion
 WW2 Arsenal
 Military Tactics
 Military Tactics
 Advancing
 Retreating
 Flanking Maneuver
 Pincer Movement
 Feint
 Rotating your Forces
 Blitzkrieg
 Breakthru
 Leapfrogging
 Divide and Conquer
 Center Peel
 Infiltration
 Encirclement
 Breakout
 Bait and Bleed
 Fabian Strategy

 Reference Guide
 The Basics
 A&A Encyclopedia
 Basic Strategy
 Cities
 Economy
 Oil and Ammo
 Terrain
 Display/Control
 Keyboard Shortcuts
 Mouse Control
 Recommended Settings
 Infantry
 Infantry
 Recon Infantry
 Regular Infantry
 Mortar Infantry
 Anti Tank Infantry
 Engineer Infantry
 Sniper Infantry
 Commando Infantry
 Conscript Infantry
 Assault Infantry
 Goliath Infantry
 Heavy Infantry
 Banzai Infantry
 Flamethrower Infantry
 Airborne
 Airborne HQ
 Heavy Airborne
 SaS Paratroopers
 Banzai Airborne
 Mech
 Mechanized HQ
 Halftracks
 Artillery Halftracks
 Anti Tank Halftracks
 Rocket Trucks
 Armor
 Armor
 Light Tanks
 Medium Tanks
 Heavy Tanks
 Artillery Tanks
 Anti Air Tanks
 Flame Tanks
 King Tiger Tanks
 Tankettes
 Rocket Tanks
 Airpower
 Airpower
 Special Ops
 Special Ops
 Upgrades
 Upgrades
 Infantry Upgrades
 AT Mech Upgrades
 Arty Mech Upgrades
 Armor Upgrades
 Arty Tank Upgrades
 Upgrades to Skip
 List of All Upgrades
 Generals
 Generals
 Germany
 Rommel
 Rundstedt
 Kesselring
 Manstein
 Great Britian
 Montgomery
 Mountbatten
 Wavell
 Wingate
 Japan
 Yamamoto
 Kuribayashi
 Mikawa
 Nagumo
 Russia
 Chuikov
 Konev
 Zhukov
 Rokossovski
 United States
 Arnold
 Eisenhower
 Nimitz
 Patton
Admin
Be Respectful - No Anger or Hostility, Thats What The Gamespy Lobby is For
21-08-2007 9:13:pm
CoffeePrince
A&A is already supported by gameranger. Were inviting more players to join in there to make the game group a lot bigger. If your interested pls pm me here to get more details for game matches thanks and have a nice day fellow generals
13-04-2014 11:23:am
Montgomery1
By good luck I found this site just before getting the game.
24-08-2011 8:10:pm
Schwieger
Glad I found this
29-07-2011 9:17:pm
WW2Freak
Dude i love the game and now a member of the website i know a lot of u guys and my other profiles on it at [Iowa]DrugMonkey, ww2freak ,and bugs bunny
07-06-2011 3:35:pm
jcrfd
Amazing information and insight of the game, thanks so much for making a wonderful source for such an awesome game like Axis & Allies..
28-05-2011 12:02:pm
penguinlover7
Awesome site! It's chock full of great A&A info! I'm so glad I found an A&A community to become a part of.
12-03-2011 5:49:pm
OwNVictoryHour
Yep Lets Get This Site and Game to new people.
27-02-2011 1:20:pm
bucs1888
We need to start advertising the game on google or somethin
23-02-2011 8:32:pm
bucs1888
This site is great i never knew about it at first
22-01-2011 11:13:pm
Only registered users can shout. Please login or create an account.
Shout History | ShoutBox ©

ARMOR
[ ARMOR ]

· Guide To Artillery Tank Upgrades
· Guide To Tank - Armor Upgrades
· British Flame Tanks
· Japanese Medium Tank Type 2 Ke-To
· ROCKET TRUCKS and ARTILLERY

AXIS-AND-ALLIES.COM: Forums


View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
United States
theharkonnen
 


Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Last Seen: Sep 06, 2014
Hits Total: 13039
Posts: 501
Location: Ohio
Badges 17/80 Level 050
Badges 17/80 Level 050

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:48 pm Reply with quote Back to top

The common view of Hitler is that he is the most evil man in the 20th century and Christians call him the antichrist. However, there are certain things that must be considered.

1. Concentration camps were first used by the British in Africa.

2. Anti-Semintism existed in Germany before WWI.

3.Stalin killed more people under his rule.. Nevertheless, the allies chose him over Hitler.

4.Germany felt betrayed by its government after WWI leading to strong nationalism before Hitler came into power.

5. The allies of WWI put a lot of blame and burden on Germany after WWI, destroying the economy.

6. Nazi Germany was first to establish a link between smoking and cancer.

7. Fascism was considered very radical. Yet a mere century ago, people felt democracy was a radical idea (In consideration of the French Revolution)

8. German militarism originated from its Prussian heritage.

Among other things. So this beckons the question of the common perception if Hitler. Was he evil or a product of his time?


Last edited by theharkonnen on Sat May 05, 2012 10:42 am; edited 2 times in total 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
Gizmotron
 


Joined: May 10, 2011
Last Seen: Mar 13, 2016
Hits Total: 20832
Posts: 583

Badges 19/80 Level 058
Badges 19/80 Level 058

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:14 am Reply with quote Back to top

those are good questions to ask-- it's always good to understand how and why people make the decisions that they do. but I believe you're setting up a false dichotomy. particularly as the notions of "evil" and "product of his time" are almost never in a position to be mutually exclusive.

take racism, for example, nearly everybody was racist in some form over 100 years ago. although it is commonly acknowledged as evil in our time, racism was considered normal back then-- there were lots of explanations and excuses for it. even though people could be racist-- there were some things that were STILL considered bad. for example, wantonly abusing and killing black slaves was considered bad even by many racists.

some behavior is so unacceptable that it doesn't matter if the perpetrator is a "product of his time".

Churchill, for example, was probably just as racist as Hitler and Stalin. while the latter two were anxious to expand their conquests and create new colonial empires-- Churchill was determined to hold on to Britain's colonial assets as much as possible. the difference, I suppose, is that Churchill was merely trying to hold on to the conquests of prior generations-- whereas Hitler and Stalin were making all new conquests within their time.

the more I learn about history the harder it becomes to define "good guys" and "bad guys". although I'm certainly pleased that the Axis lost WWII-- the nature of war itself stains every nation involved.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
theharkonnen
 


Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Last Seen: Sep 06, 2014
Hits Total: 13039
Posts: 501
Location: Ohio
Badges 17/80 Level 050
Badges 17/80 Level 050

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:38 am Reply with quote Back to top

I was struggling to come up with a good heading, so accuracy really wasn't the goal.

According to accounts, most Germans didn't know about the concetration camps either. So rascism didn't really represent the Reich at the time.

To be honest, if you look at it this way, I probably would have honestly joined the Nazi Party (If I were German and given the time period). Hitler offered an alternative to the system that failed (The Great Depression) and provided a war of vegence for WWI. Therefore, Hitler offered what could have been a system of change and a bright future. This is probably why even intelligent people, like Dr. Geobbel, joined him. Not to mention the fact that Hitler's programs brought the German out of the depression quicker and before all the other industrialized economies at the time. Plus, there was a fear of communism to consider...

It is also interesting that roughly a hundred years before Hitler, we had Napaleon, before him King Louis, who also threatended Europe. It seems that every hundred years or so, a force of destabilization is developed. Before Louis, there were the Protestants, before, the Protestants a mightly Spain, the Rise of the Ottomans, the Mongols, and the list goes on. This leads one to assume another force will arise this century as well. Maybe an awakened China, maybe a reborn Russia, who knows. These forces shake up the staus quo, for better or for worse. Probably for the better, for if we didn't have such destabilization, people would grow too complacent and comfortable.


Also one must consider that historically, the most successful empires are the most ruthless ones. America wasn't kind to the Native Americans, the Spanish were not kind to the Incas and Aztecs. Nor were the Mongols kind (They exterminated cities), nor were the Romans. When these empires grew more liberal and corrupt, they declined and fell. So Hitler's assumption that ruthlessness=success may not be wrong. Morally wrong, yes, but would one rather have ten years of very bloody and destructive war, follwed by a long period of peace, or 100 years of somewhat bloody and somewhat destructive war (Stalemates), followed by a short period of peace? Logically, the first seems to be the better choice...
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
Planetshakers
 


Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Last Seen: Jan 19, 2013
Hits Total: 24888
Posts: 1076

Badges 35/80 Level 107
Badges 35/80 Level 107

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:20 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Why would he be the Anitchrist ? It can't be, I know that he is an evil leader but he cannot be one. However we do not know who that person will be. He just wanted to control into one Aryan race. Even the Swastika was used a long before the Hitler even took the emblem as a stand for his race. It was used in many ancient civilizations. I think one of the most successful empires that I could think is the Mongol Empire. They controlled the world's largest land mass that is even greater than the Roman Empire. From Moscow to Korea, their marksmanship to brutality contribute the injustices that the Mongols had to order. Technically the empire was too vast to control since Genghis Khan started his campaign. There was reason why the Allies chose Hitler than Stalin, it was the government. Communism back in 1930's and still today now was an informal distributive of wealth with the poor staying poor and the middle and upper class men are getting rich. I really do not like the idea of Communism because of how selfish people can be in the government.

This is also the same thing Mussolini, the Allied governments also liked him even better than Hitler himself. Mussolini signed a anti-Hitler pact with Britain and France before he switched and supported the Spanish Civil War on Franco's side. History shows the significant products that whether how they act prove a leader to become infamous.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
theharkonnen
 


Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Last Seen: Sep 06, 2014
Hits Total: 13039
Posts: 501
Location: Ohio
Badges 17/80 Level 050
Badges 17/80 Level 050

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 11:27 am Reply with quote Back to top

Planetshakers wrote:
Why would he be the Anitchrist ? It can't be, I know that he is an evil leader but he cannot be one. However we do not know who that person will be. He just wanted to control into one Aryan race. Even the Swastika was used a long before the Hitler even took the emblem as a stand for his race. It was used in many ancient civilizations. I think one of the most successful empires that I could think is the Mongol Empire. They controlled the world's largest land mass that is even greater than the Roman Empire. From Moscow to Korea, their marksmanship to brutality contribute the injustices that the Mongols had to order. Technically the empire was too vast to control since Genghis Khan started his campaign. There was reason why the Allies chose Hitler than Stalin, it was the government. Communism back in 1930's and still today now was an informal distributive of wealth with the poor staying poor and the middle and upper class men are getting rich. I really do not like the idea of Communism because of how selfish people can be in the government.

This is also the same thing Mussolini, the Allied governments also liked him even better than Hitler himself. Mussolini signed a anti-Hitler pact with Britain and France before he switched and supported the Spanish Civil War on Franco's side. History shows the significant products that whether how they act prove a leader to become infamous.


Well, if you take away wealth as a class divider (as the goal of communism was), the de facto class structure will focus around power, which governmant officials had plenty of.

It really doesn't matter how you do it, there will always be have and have-nots. Its simply how the system works. Now, which is better , to divide people by wealth or power, is the question.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
Planetshakers
 


Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Last Seen: Jan 19, 2013
Hits Total: 24888
Posts: 1076

Badges 35/80 Level 107
Badges 35/80 Level 107

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 8:36 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Hmm interesting wealth and power can not really matter, but both of the governments are structured on the people instead. However I think the Facist government has more economic chance than the Communists think about it for a sec. The Communists relied heavily on Allied supplies through the lend and lease program agreed in the Tehran conference.

"The attempt to combine wisdom and power has only rarely been successful and then only for a short while."
Albert Einstein

Here Einstein can also refer that you cannot have both wealth and power at the same time. Have you heard of the phrase "Absolute power corrupts absolutely." Well it is the same idea that both of the systems are failures in the government. Democracy or a republic is a #1 choice for me in my opinion.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
theharkonnen
 


Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Last Seen: Sep 06, 2014
Hits Total: 13039
Posts: 501
Location: Ohio
Badges 17/80 Level 050
Badges 17/80 Level 050

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:39 am Reply with quote Back to top

Well, the problem with democracy is that the rich rule essentially. In the US, Wall Street controls the government, especially republicans who are eager to give them tax breaks.

I think a benovolent dictatorship would be best, like China, but without the human rights stuff. Mostly because most Chinese officials have degrees in enginerring or economics, while in the US, it is uaually law. Plus, the government in China is in control, not the corporations (At least to an extent). When I was in China, I found it interesitng how I was arguing for the Chinese government, while the Chinese person who I was talking to, whose father was a Chinese ambassador, was arguing for Chinese democracy. I found this interesting.

Also, democracy is like high school and I hated high school. The popular kids get everything (Politicians), despite being as dumb as a briick, the strong push the weak around, and you have you groups of people, with the outcasts being screwed (Me).

The other problem with democracy is that there is no real moral incentive to do anything, except personal gain. When you work, you work for a company that will probably disappear in the next century, whereas, say under communsim, you work for the benefit of the nation (In theory, at least).

It is also interesting how fascism originated from socialism. Nazi stands for national socialist, while Mussolini was actually a socialist originally. They just took the national aspect to the extreme. Meanwhile, communism/socialism as an answer to capitalism.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
theharkonnen
 


Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Last Seen: Sep 06, 2014
Hits Total: 13039
Posts: 501
Location: Ohio
Badges 17/80 Level 050
Badges 17/80 Level 050

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 10:45 am Reply with quote Back to top

In the first post, added Prussian heritage as a reason. Forgot about that until now.

Prussia was such a cool state back then. I think Volitaire once said something like "While most states possess an army, the Prussian army possesses a state." Plus the Teutonic Order, which Prussia is based off of was not very nice towards its enemies, much like the Nazis.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
Planetshakers
 


Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Last Seen: Jan 19, 2013
Hits Total: 24888
Posts: 1076

Badges 35/80 Level 107
Badges 35/80 Level 107

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 3:50 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Well what most of us live is in a democratic republic country but the problem we have most is the economy itself. It's mainly because we spend to much on the military instead of trying to focus on the people.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
PanzerKreig
 


Joined: May 09, 2012
Last Seen: Mar 21, 2013
Hits Total: 4593
Posts: 602
Location: Europe
Badges 20/80 Level 060
Badges 20/80 Level 060

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 12:11 am Reply with quote Back to top

I think it's time, it changes people and landscapes. Also the people who you have around you.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
Planetshakers
 


Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Last Seen: Jan 19, 2013
Hits Total: 24888
Posts: 1076

Badges 35/80 Level 107
Badges 35/80 Level 107

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2012 4:49 pm Reply with quote Back to top

So you say hes is a product of a time? Why?
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
PanzerKreig
 


Joined: May 09, 2012
Last Seen: Mar 21, 2013
Hits Total: 4593
Posts: 602
Location: Europe
Badges 20/80 Level 060
Badges 20/80 Level 060

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 10:01 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Why? He wanted to be a painter and he painted good you know but "Jews" didn't credit him to be good, he was homeless and joined the army...he made some friend and one in particular forgot his name was influential (had money). Anyways where i'm getting with this is Himmler organized the execution of Jews and a meeting was held that even Hitler did not know. And to seem that he was not stabbed in the back he let this go on or otherwise the SS might of overthrown him. And to this I don't find Hitler to be a evil man he did what was right for his country as many other leaders.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
Planetshakers
 


Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Last Seen: Jan 19, 2013
Hits Total: 24888
Posts: 1076

Badges 35/80 Level 107
Badges 35/80 Level 107

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 10:58 pm Reply with quote Back to top

LOL hes a failure at everything. I don't think so he was just evil to the Jews is what I think.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
PanzerKreig
 


Joined: May 09, 2012
Last Seen: Mar 21, 2013
Hits Total: 4593
Posts: 602
Location: Europe
Badges 20/80 Level 060
Badges 20/80 Level 060

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 11:34 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Eh history is 50% fact and 50% bull shit Smile. Even way older history. I see many gaps where should be information and plus people can write history in their own ways and 2 people writing about the same time line you still get different results. Hitler was awesome in my opinion until he was changed.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
Planetshakers
 


Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Last Seen: Jan 19, 2013
Hits Total: 24888
Posts: 1076

Badges 35/80 Level 107
Badges 35/80 Level 107

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:17 pm Reply with quote Back to top

History repeats itself and we must learn mistakes to not to repeat it in the future.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
PanzerKreig
 


Joined: May 09, 2012
Last Seen: Mar 21, 2013
Hits Total: 4593
Posts: 602
Location: Europe
Badges 20/80 Level 060
Badges 20/80 Level 060

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 8:57 am Reply with quote Back to top

Some we have to change the outcome to be a better future.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
Planetshakers
 


Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Last Seen: Jan 19, 2013
Hits Total: 24888
Posts: 1076

Badges 35/80 Level 107
Badges 35/80 Level 107

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 3:32 pm Reply with quote Back to top

thats what i just said lol.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
PanzerKreig
 


Joined: May 09, 2012
Last Seen: Mar 21, 2013
Hits Total: 4593
Posts: 602
Location: Europe
Badges 20/80 Level 060
Badges 20/80 Level 060

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:23 pm Reply with quote Back to top

We are not doing a very good job at this tho lol.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
theharkonnen
 


Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Last Seen: Sep 06, 2014
Hits Total: 13039
Posts: 501
Location: Ohio
Badges 17/80 Level 050
Badges 17/80 Level 050

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:22 pm Reply with quote Back to top

OMG, this thread is confusing.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
Planetshakers
 


Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Last Seen: Jan 19, 2013
Hits Total: 24888
Posts: 1076

Badges 35/80 Level 107
Badges 35/80 Level 107

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 3:27 pm Reply with quote Back to top

I think you should change the title lol.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
PanzerKreig
 


Joined: May 09, 2012
Last Seen: Mar 21, 2013
Hits Total: 4593
Posts: 602
Location: Europe
Badges 20/80 Level 060
Badges 20/80 Level 060

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 4:59 pm Reply with quote Back to top

This should clear things up

In Marxist theory, pure communism is a specific stage of historical development that inevitably emerges from the development of the productive forces that leads to a superabundance of material wealth, allowing for distribution based on need and social relations based on freely associated individuals.[1][2] The exact definition of communism varies, and it is often mistakenly, in general political discourse, used interchangeably with socialism; however, Marxist theory contends that socialism is just a transitional stage on the road to communism. Leninism adds to Marxism the notion of a vanguard party to lead the proletarian revolution and to secure all political power after the revolution for the working class, for the development of universal class consciousness and worker participation, in a transitional stage between capitalism and socialism.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
PanzerKreig
 


Joined: May 09, 2012
Last Seen: Mar 21, 2013
Hits Total: 4593
Posts: 602
Location: Europe
Badges 20/80 Level 060
Badges 20/80 Level 060

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 5:00 pm Reply with quote Back to top

And more on Communism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist-Leninist
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
Planetshakers
 


Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Last Seen: Jan 19, 2013
Hits Total: 24888
Posts: 1076

Badges 35/80 Level 107
Badges 35/80 Level 107

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 9:08 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Communist fails.
Democracy succeeds.
Look at it.

80 years compared to the 2000 years.
who win the Russians or the Greeks?
The Greeks of course because of how they governed over the citizens and other people until their collapse.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
theharkonnen
 


Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Last Seen: Sep 06, 2014
Hits Total: 13039
Posts: 501
Location: Ohio
Badges 17/80 Level 050
Badges 17/80 Level 050

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 5:03 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Planetshakers wrote:
Communist fails.
Democracy succeeds.
Look at it.

80 years compared to the 2000 years.
who win the Russians or the Greeks?
The Greeks of course because of how they governed over the citizens and other people until their collapse.


Uh, Rome conquered Greece you know. Also, democracy in its current form didn't come about until around the last one or two centuries. Before that it was Republic and even democracy was considered too radical during the 1848 revolutions. Source: My history teacher.

By your logic, totalitarianism would be the best form of gov't since it lasted for over 2000 years, way before democracy.

Even systems of monarchy lasted longer than democracy. England had a revolution for republic (closet thing to democracy at the time) and they went back to monarchy. It also produced Oliver Cromwell. Meanwhile the French Revolution for republic produced Napoleon.

Even Hitler came to power in a democracy (Weimer Republic).

I think Russia failed, not because of communism, but because of its situation. WWII left America mostly untouched, while 90% of the Russian infrastructure was destroyed. So they had a lot of catching up to do and they couldn't do it.
 
View user's profile Send private message
United States
PanzerKreig
 


Joined: May 09, 2012
Last Seen: Mar 21, 2013
Hits Total: 4593
Posts: 602
Location: Europe
Badges 20/80 Level 060
Badges 20/80 Level 060

Last Shout: No Shouts Yet



PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:09 pm Reply with quote Back to top

And now is not democracy in america, its capitalism, witch is bad for every one who is not in the 1%.
 
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:       
Post new topic   Reply to topic

View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2008 phpBB Group
:: Theme & Graphics by Daz :: Ported for PHP-Nuke by nukemods.com ::
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Forums ©
(Original PHP-Nuke Code Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi)
Page Generation: 0.23 Seconds

You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php

Distributed by Raven PHP Scripts
New code written and maintained by the RavenNuke™ TEAM


All logos, trademarks, and GNU Free Documentation in this site are property of their respective owner(s). www.axis-and-allies.com is an independently run community site for the Axis and Allies RTS, and is not affiliated with Atari, Timegate, Gamespy, or Encore Entertainment. Axis & Allies © 2006 Encore Software, Inc. All rights reserved. AXIS & ALLIES is a registered trademark of Hasbro, Inc. GameSpy and the "Powered by GameSpy" design are trademarks of GameSpy Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. GameSpy Arcade is an independent gaming service run by GameSpy. TimeGate Studios and the TimeGate Studios logo are trademarks of TimeGate Studios, Inc. Any comments and forum posts are property of their posters, all the rest ©2007- by www.axis-and-allies.com


:: fisubice phpbb2 style by Daz :: PHP-Nuke theme by www.nukemods.com ::
:: fisubice Theme Recoded To 100% W3C CSS & HTML 4.01 Transitional & XHTML 1.0 Transitional Compliance by RavenNuke™ TEAM ::