 |
|
 Home |
|
|
 Communication |
| |
|
 News |
| |
|
 Site Info |
| |
|
 Links |
| |
|
|
 WW2 History |
| |
|
 Military Tactics |
| |
|
|
 Reference Guide |
|
|
 The Basics |
| |
|
| Display/Control |
| |
|
| Infantry |
| |
|
| Airborne |
| |
|
| Mech |
| |
|
| Armor |
| |
|
| Airpower |
| |
|
| Special Ops |
| |
|
| Upgrades |
| |
|
| Generals |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
| AXIS-AND-ALLIES.COM: Forums |
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
KraznyOktyabr
Joined: Nov 11, 2010
Last Seen: Nov 14, 2010
Hits Total: 136
Posts: 3
Badges 01/80 Level 001
Last Shout: [YouTube]
|
 Posted:
Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:30 am |
 
|
BRITAIN: Heavy Airborne or Heavy Infantry? THis one confuses me.  |
| |
|
|
|
HornedFrogAggie
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
Last Seen: Jan 21, 2011
Hits Total: 67
Posts: 2
Location: Texas
Badges 01/80 Level 001
Last Shout: Great Site!
|
| Posted:
Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:42 pm |
|
SAS vs inf Heavy airborne vs mech |
| |
|
|
|
|
Planetshakers
Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Hits Today: 66
Hits Total: 5481
Posts: 464
Badges 15/80 Level 046
Last Shout: No Shouts Yet
|
| Posted:
Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:01 pm |
|
If You are Britain you should either go SAS or mech then arty. Britain's heavy airbone is far less upgraded. Japan would be the best for heavy airbone or motars they both have a better chance of routing and running |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001-2008 phpBB Group
:: Theme & Graphics by Daz :: Ported for PHP-Nuke by nukemods.com ::
All times are GMT - 6 Hours |
|
|
|
|
|
