Japanese Mortars or Heavy Airborne?
Japan has many options when it comes to
Infantry, and good upgrades as well, such as
Special Forces,
Improved Mortars,
Foraging,
Plentiful Ammunition, and more.. While
Commandos certainly have their place in the game, many experienced players can't seem to agree on which in better, Japanese
Mortar Infantry or
Heavy Airborne. So we thought we would take a moment to profile these two commonly seen regiments, and maybe you can decide for yourself..
First, let's take a look at the regimental level, with the most obvious differences being that the
Mortar Infantry regiment has [2]
Mortar Infantry Units and [1]
MG Unit, while the
Heavy Airborne regiment has exactly the opposite. The
Mortar Infantry regiment costs a little less at

$65, and of course these these two regiments are deployed from different HQ's. There are differences between airborne and infantry units as well, but we will cover those in a moment.
Mortar Infantry Regiment
$65
Heavy Airborne Regiment
$75
 |
infantry mortar unit
health = 150
defense = 1
speed-max = 2
BlastDamageEffect = 35
MoraleLossEffect = 1
|
 |
airborne mortar unit
health = 150
defense = 2
speed-max = 2.5
BlastDamageEffect = 35
MoraleLossEffect = 1
|
UNITS: Mortars
 |
infantry machine gun unit
health = 150
defense = 1
speed-max = 2.5
PierceDamageEffect = 12
|
 |
airborne machine gun unit
health = 150
defense = 2
speed-max = 2.5
PierceDamageEffect = 12
|
UNITS: Machine Gun
 |
infantry unit
health = 200
defense = 1
recharge-time = 3
Grenade = 20
PierceDamageEffect = 10
|
 |
airborne unit
health = 200
defense = 2
recharge-time = 2
Grenade = 25
PierceDamageEffect = 12
|
UNITS: Infantry
Heavy Airborne has the decided advantage, thanks in part to the
Type 100 Submachinegun, with better attack speed [33%], better defense value [2], better grenades [25], and better Pierce Damage Effect [12].
 |
infantry commanding officer
health = 200
defense = 1
PierceDamageEffect = 10
Grenade = 20
|
 |
airborne commanding officer
health = 250
defense = 2
PierceDamageEffect = 12
Grenade = 25
|
UNITS: Officers
Once again
Heavy Airborne has the decided advantage, thanks in part to the
Type 100 Submachinegun, with better defense value [2], better grenades [25], and better Pierce Damage Effect [12]
Conclusion
Well there you have it, all the info you need to decide for yourself which regiment you prefer.. Make sure to vote in the poll, and contribute to the discussion in our
Mortars or Heavy Airborne Thread
zling comments: First of all, as the article says, this is a question mainly for Japan. other countries will be better off with different units, well Germany, especially with Kesselring can also put both mortars and heavy airbornes to pretty good use.
Imho the question boils down to the following: are you facing enemy infantry(SAS, Snipers, Commandos, etc) or early mechs. if facing infantry than the additional mortar troop per regiment is more valuable than the overall increased strength per soldier of the heavy airbornes. however when facing mechs the heavy airbornes shine, being the strongest infantry/airborne regiment available, and that the mortar itself doesn't do that much damage against mechs, as opposed to other infantries.
another thing to note is that mortars are a lot easier to spam, being produced from a 5 unit tent(infantry) as opposed to a 3 unit tent(airborne), so in any type of fast build mortars are superior.